I have been told that I don’t understand modern day adoption. I have been told what I write about is all in the past. So I guess now we do not change birth certificates. Everyone has access to their OBC, right. Adoptees are absolutely equal to every other US citizen. PAP are not ever encouraged to be in the delivery room and that puts no pressure on expectant women to place their child.
Our laws are still against expectant mothers. Woman are still given papers to relinquish their children while they are in the hospital, while their child is in the hospital. While they are still recovering from the delivery. They are given the papers while PAP are outside of the room, in the hospital. No that does not speak of pressure and coercion at all. Obviously things have changed a lot. It seems to be a lot more sly with coercion. While woman are crying hysterically they are given papers to relinquish their child. Yes that is happening today in our society.
Our laws are still against expectant mothers. Woman are still given papers to relinquish their children while they are in the hospital, while their child is in the hospital. While they are still recovering from the delivery. They are given the papers while PAP are outside of the room, in the hospital. No that does not speak of pressure and coercion at all. Obviously things have changed a lot. It seems to be a lot more sly with coercion. While woman are crying hysterically they are given papers to relinquish their child. Yes that is happening today in our society.
Why is there not a waiting period after you sign the papers before your rights are relinquished in every state? Why do dads have barely any legal rights to their children? Why do case workers not always tell mothers that once the papers are signed they will not be able to get their child’s OBC? That is told after the papers are signed. Why are woman told not to put the fathers name on the OBC if they are planning to place their child for adoption? Yes that does happen in 2010. How are these children going to feel in 18 years or more when they find out their father is not on their OBC. Will they question their moms honesty and wonder if their mom’s even know who their dad is?
Four years ago I could not buy a car in California in the evening because there was a too high of chance that I was making a decision when I was too tired. Mothers are allowed to sign relinquishment papers in 2010 when they have slept 6 hours in the last 72 hours and had barely ate 400 of calories food in the last 3 days.
I can not imagine a natural mother being okay with letting their adult child relinquish their parental rights. I’m sure it happens but the natural mother that does allow that has to be rare. Most of us are not okay with seeing our children experience the same pain as us. Adoption agencies encourage natural mothers to sit on panels and share the great experience of adoption with other mothers. As natural mothers we wouldn’t want our children to go through it but some natural mothers encourage our friends and other women?
I was also told Utah has great laws for parents giving up their rights. Is that why adoption agencies actually bring expectant mothers to Utah because of the laws protecting or exploiting natural mothers?
Maybe now a day’s adoption are different because agencies do not sell babies? There is no money exchanged ever for a child, right. There are no receipts for children, no checks being written, and no loans taken out to buy a baby. Obviously adoption is very different than 18 years ago.
While we are on the subject different races of children all sell for different prices? Why? Why is one child worth more than others in the agencies and PAPs eyes?
I have been told that women will live in poverty when they keep their children. Of course that is possible and it does happen. Does it make them bad parents? I have known several women that started off as teenage moms. That lived in poverty, they fought for everything they had. They were amazing moms too. And now they are lawyers and business owners. Their kids could not have been prouder because they have seen what their mothers have overcame . They have seen the struggles and accomplishments of their moms. Is that a bad lesson to teach your children?
I have also been told if adoptive couples close the adoption they can still adopt another child through the same agency. I’m sorry but wtf? They have proven to an adoption agency they are liars and unethical but the adoption agency still will allow them to adopt they just put a note in their file for future natural mom. Obviously adoption is not at all about money right? One set of natural parent and their families have been crushed when the adoption closes but the agency will still sell another child to the same couple.
I do not mean to say that infertile couples are mean or abusive. I absolutely know they are not. I do know they just want a child of their own. Most couples would be just as happy to have a child of their own naturally without adoption. Adoption is about the child and not the adoptive parents. But if adoption is about the child and there is only 1 infant child for every 30 to 40 couples trying to adopt why aren’t the same couples looking into teenage/older child adoption through foster care?
Don’t those kids deserve a home just as much as a cute cuddly newborn? Is it because you can see the loss and sadness that foster kids have, where as all newborns cry the same. You don’t see the loss in newborns eyes. Everyone takes it as “your” child because you adopted the child as a newborn not an older child. Yes adoption has changed so much in the last 18 years.
Don’t those kids deserve a home just as much as a cute cuddly newborn? Is it because you can see the loss and sadness that foster kids have, where as all newborns cry the same. You don’t see the loss in newborns eyes. Everyone takes it as “your” child because you adopted the child as a newborn not an older child. Yes adoption has changed so much in the last 18 years.